methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-6 Wochen10-20 min daily30-60 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
4-1011-63-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus ListFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods