methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration of an activity-role table with clear RACI assignments and one highlighted accountable role per activity.
Operations
RACI Matrix
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-6 Wochen45-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-104-102-82-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanRACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision NotesFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations
Root causeQualityOperations
Add more methods