methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
A paper-based illustration representing WSJF with its core stages and visible working result.
Agile
WSJF
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighHighLow
Timedifferent
15-30 min45-90 min1-6 Wochen30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-63-104-101-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Root cause notes, CountermeasuresRanked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus List
Tagsno overlap
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
Add more methods